She blew it open, She actually discovered that this had gone awry... [See video]
Sorry, but that's not correct.See for yourself
all that had been blown open and discovered before she entered the picture. It's all documented and verifiable, and has been since the beginning.So is this
That's not to take anything away from outstanding investigative reporting. I have nothing but the greatest admiration for making this happen on network news. Vital and original information was uncovered and exposed, and without it, chances are it would have forever remained in the obscure province of disgruntled #justabloggers. But let's get the chronology straight, as well as who did what.
Ah well, I suppose I ought to be used to it by now
. It's just that even fricking Wikipedia refuses to mention any of this in their "history," and not for lack of people making corrective entries. Those keep getting edited out. That makes Mike and me ideological "unpersons," written completely out of the narrative, and only those doing the editing could tell us their motives--if you could figure out who they are.
So why should we expect anything less from corporate media?
Maybe I ought to give Gottlieb his plaque back
Oh, and one more thing, Laura: It wasn't a "sting." Not unless you believe in Underpants Gnomes
It gets old. And it's so unnecessary.
UPDATE: They can't say they/their staffs haven't been given verifiable information:
Look for absolutely nothing to happen in 3...2...1...